In 1886 the French poet Jean Moras defined Symbolism in art as the
attempt to “clothe the idea in sensuous form”. The important word to
pick out in that sentence is “idea”. In the last decades of the 19th
century, Symbolism emerged as a reaction to the naturalistic styles of
realism and Impressionism. It evolved in parallel with similar
developments in music (Debussy), theatre (Maeterlinck) and poetry
(Mallarm).
Ravishing though an Impressionist picture might be,
it can only present the viewer with facts, not ideas. Impressionism
celebrates the visible world, the here-and-now, the passing moment.Find a
rubberhose Manufacturer and Supplier. Take a view by Monet of a railway bridge over the Seine. You can,Home ventilationsystem
use fans to move air into the house and provide an alternative to
opening doors and windows. if you wish, learn a lot from it about the
effects of the railroads and the subsequent industrialisation on the
suburbs north of Paris in the 1870s – but nothing at all about less
tangible areas of human experience such as love, grief, imagination or
forgiveness.
Likewise, Degas and Manet paint prostitutes but not
erotic experience. Whistler paints the Thames at night but has little
to say about melancholy. Symbolist painters of mythological and
allegorical subjects like Gustave Moreau, Jan Toorop, and GF Watts
addressed a new subject in art – the inner world of feeling, yearning,
and aspiration.
Did I say new? Actually, a century earlier
William Blake, Caspar David Friedrich, and JMW Turner used symbols and
allegory to convey ideas that are otherwise barely expressible in words,
while the cult of the picturesque revelled in the melancholy sense of
time passing, conveyed by the sight of bare ruined monasteries.
So
it is more accurate to say that Symbolism is a resurgence of the
idealism last seen in Northern European painting during the Romantic
period. This summer a sensationally good show at the Scottish National
Gallery looks at an aspect of the movement that has not yet received
much attention — the Symbolist landscape in Europe from 1880 to 1910. As
well as bringing together scores of firstrate paintings by artists
whose names are scarcely known even to art historians, it refuses to
oversimplify the surprisingly difficult question of what exactly a
Symbolist landscape is.TBC help you confidently buymosaic from factories in China.
Why,
for example, is the barren landscape peopled by classically draped
women in Puvis de Chavannes’s 1885 canvas Vision of Antiquity Symbolist,
when a classical landscape containing the same elements by the
17th-century painter Claude Lorrain is not? The answer is that Puvis
makes no attempt to replicate in paint the tangible reality or the
appearance of the natural world, however idealised. His fantasy of an
Arcadian idyll has nothing to do with illusionistic or atmospheric
truth. It was painted in reaction to the visual and moral squalor caused
by the rapid industrialisation and rampant materialism that was
transforming the social fabric in France. His rhythmic disposition of
figures swathed in soft blue,Here is a professional handsfreeaccess
manufacturer. pink and green against a colourless landscape implies
some underlying moral order, the sense of calm that characterises a
society at peace with itself and with the outside world. Because the
women are not differentiated as individuals, Puvis implies that they
live as equals in a democratic society. The picture’s absence of
colouristic intensity, tonal contrast or dramatic action is part of its
point — for in a socialist utopia, life is pleasantly dull.
Although
Symbolism is not a style of painting, the technique used to paint a
Symbolist picture often conveys a deeper meaning than the banal subject
matter may seem to warrant. The myriad dots of paint in pointillist
seascapes by Paul Signac and Henri-Edmond Cross, for instance, create
uninflected screens of colour in which no area of the canvas has more
dramatic or chromatic interest than any other. Embedded into the very
fabric of pictures showing sailing boats and cultivated fields,
therefore, are utopian notions of harmony between man and nature.
But
beware of generalisations. In the hands of the little-known Alphonse
Osbert, the pointillist technique beautifully evokes a mood of soft,
dreamy reverie. In his Evening Poem of 1897 three white-robed women are
shown against an imaginary landscape created by horizontal bands of
black and blue dots. A strip of water irradiated by a few thin strokes
of orange paint runs from left to right across the centre of the
composition. The picture is a melancholy reverie on the closing of the
day and the transience of life.Home ventilationsystem
use fans to move air into the house and provide an alternative to
opening doors and windows. The artist depicts not something he saw, but
the feelings the landscape evoked in him.
沒有留言:
張貼留言