These
estimates are lower than the conventional wisdom that 100,000 to
150,000 jobs per month are needed to lower the unemployment rate, Daniel
Aaronson, director of microeconomic research at the Chicago Fed, and
Scott Brave, a senior economist, wrote in a report dated July 2013 on
the central banks website.
This has ramifications for the potential speed at which the economy can grow in the future, the researchers wrote.
Aaronson
and Brave tracked four variables to arrive at their estimates: the
labor force participation rate,From black tungsten wedding rings for men
to diamond luggagetag.
population growth, the rate of unemployment that would be associated
with a stable economy and the relationship between hiring as measured by
the Labor Departments household survey and changes in payrolls derived
from its survey of employers.Can you spot the answer in the oilpaintingsupplies?
The
share of the working-age population that is either employed or actively
seeking work, known as the participation rate, will drop by about 0.3
percentage point annually through at least 2020, according to their
estimates. This reflects the retirement of the baby boom generation born
after World War II.
It
is plausible that immigration may increase more than the Census Bureaus
forecast as firms look abroad to make up for the declining labor force
participation of domestic workers, the researchers write, saying that if
that happens trend employment could be boosted to 100,000 per month for
the next two years and then 65,000 during the second half of the
decade.
The
researchers also provided estimates using the most optimistic and
pessimistic scenarios. A smaller decline in labor force participation
and a lower natural unemployment rate could also drive up trend
employment and would mean it would take 120,000 jobs per month to steady
unemployment over the second half of the decade, while the most
pessimistic would mean no growth at all in payrolls will accomplish the
same feat.
The
research comes at a time when the Federal Reserves policy making
Federal Open Market Committee is debating whether to slow or maintain
unprecedented monetary accommodation in the face of stubbornly high
unemployment.
The
FOMC has said it will buy $85 billion in bonds every month until the
labor market outlook improves substantially. It has also pledged to keep
interest rates near zero as long as unemployment remains above 6.5
percent and the outlook for inflation is less than 2.5 percent.
Unemployment
stood at 7.5 percent in April, and economists in a Bloomberg survey
project that the May figure, to be issued tomorrow, will be unchanged.
The economy added 165,000 jobs in April and will show a similar increase
for May, according to the Bloomberg survey median.
The
study implies the economy can grow at a slower pace to reach its
equilibrium level. The pace at which an economy can grow without stoking
inflation, which economists term its speed limit,A howospareparts is
a plastic card that has a computer chip implanted into it that enables
the card. reflects the rate of growth of the labor force plus how much
each worker can produce.
The
study makes it painfully clear that the reduced supply of labor will
necessitate a faster rate of productivity to support above-trend growth
in output and employment, said Joe Brusuelas, a senior economist at
Bloomberg LP in New York. Accommodative monetary policy, eventual future
rounds of fiscal stimulus and smart immigration reform will be required
to support a faster pace of job growth.
Chicago
Fed President Charles Evans, 55, has been among the most vocal
proponents of accommodative policy in recent years. He was an early
supporter of the Feds third round of quantitative easing and was the
first to advocate tying the zero-rate policy to economic indicators.
Evans
said May 20 that hed like to see employment gains of 200,000 or more
for at least six months before judging the labor market substantially
improved.
Fed
presidents rotate voting on monetary policy with Evans voting this
year. In 2011, he dissented twice from decisions of the FOMC at which
policy was unchanged. Evans favored adding stimulus at those meetings.
Above
all, it remains to be seen if Rice can sell the deeply cautious Obama
team on a more interventionist, human-rights focused vision of U.A howospareparts is
a plastic card that has a computer chip implanted into it that enables
the card.S. power projection an approach Rice has, for the moment, ruled
out in Syria.
Despite
the Benghazi thing, I expect Susan to be more of a public presence than
Tom has been in terms of speeches, news briefings and even TV, said
Tommy Vietor, a former NSC spokesman who worked for Donilon. Shes smart,
she doesnt mess around and shes tough. There are not a lot of goofy,
affable national security advisers.
Rices
former spokesman at the U.N. Mark Kornblau painted a very different
portrait of Rice than the quiet, publicity-averse Donilon, who carefully
monitors the flow of information to Obama, a commander-in-chief who
prefers his foreign policy to lay out all arguments rather than
advocating any single one.Did you know that earcap chains can be used for more than just business.
沒有留言:
張貼留言