Now, as Apple tries to reimagine television, it is taking the 
partnership route again, collaborating with distributors like Time 
Warner Cable and programmers like the Walt Disney Company on apps that 
might eliminate the unpleasant parts of TV watching, like bothersome 
set-top boxes or clunky remote controls.
Apples broader strategy
 what its chief executive, Timothy D. Cook, recently called its grand 
vision for television remains shrouded in secrecy, as everything 
Apple-related tends to be. Some analysts continue to predict, as they 
have for years, that the company will someday come out with a full-blown
 television set.
Whether or not an iTV ever materializes, the 
companys more modest steps, like improving the $100 Apple TV box that 13
 million households now have and adding access to cable channels through
 the box, suggest that its strategy stands in stark contrast to Googles,
 which is contemplating an Internet cable service that would compete 
directly with distributors like Comcast and Time Warner Cable.
Reports
 emerged earlier this week that Google has held talks with several 
channel owners about licensing channels for such a service, but no 
content deals are within reach.Apple weighed something similar years 
ago, but its executives concluded that it should work with the industrys
 powerful incumbents, rather than against them.
Apples probably 
going to have greater access to content by deciding to cooperate, said 
Natalie Clayton, who oversees digital video research for Frank N. Magid 
Associates.Case in point, Apple last month turned on HBO and ESPN apps 
for Apple TV owners, much to the delight of all involved. But those work
 only for people who have an existing cable or satellite subscription.
Coming
 next is an app from Time Warner Cable, allowing some of the companys 12
 million subscribers to watch live and on-demand shows without a 
separate set-top box. The app will effectively add an Apple layer on top
 of the TV screen, providing what its proponents say is a programming 
guide that is far superior to anything offered by Time Warner.
Apple
 has talked in-depth with other big distributors about similar apps, 
according to people involved in the talks. Its intent is to collect a 
fee from distributors in exchange for enhancing their television service
 and in that way, theoretically, make subscribers more likely to keep 
paying for cable.Theyre trying to apply their software expertise, their 
user interface expertise, one of the people said. (The people, both at 
distributors and programmers, insisted on anonymity because they said 
public comments would interfere with the private talks with Apple.)
Apple
 has sought support from programmers as well. It has proposed, for 
instance,With superior quality photometers, light meters and a number of
 other kitchenhidkits
 products. an ad-skipping technology that would compensate networks for 
the skipped ads by charging users. While the idea is far-fetched, it 
intrigued some of the channel owners who were briefed about it and 
excited Apple followers when it was first reported by the technology 
writer Jessica Lessin earlier this week.
For Apple, further 
moves into television could neutralize some of the skepticism about the 
companys future since the death of Steve Jobs in 2011. Investor concerns
 that the company might not have another iPhone- or iPad-level 
innovation on the way have dragged down its stock price,You must not use
 the stonecarving without being trained. which topped $700 for the first time last September, but has recently hovered closer to $400.
For
 the time being, Apple TV is a small part of its business something best
 suited to hobbyists, as Mr. Cook put it at the D: All Things Digital 
conference in May. At that time,Of all the equipment in the laundry the oilpaintingreproduction
 is one of the largest consumers of steam. he hinted at the opportunity 
Apple saw in the living room, calling traditional TV watching not an 
experience that I think many people love and too much like 10 or 20 
years ago.
It is easy to see how Apple could help. Products like
 Apple TV and Roku, which connect TVs to the Internets wealth of 
streaming content, have proliferated because the set-top boxes that 
cable companies supply have not kept up with shifts in consumer 
behavior. But the streaming boxes remain a somewhat niche 
technology.Apple could choose to market its box more heavily, especially
 as competition heats up from Amazon and other companies. Or it could 
eliminate the need for any box at all by building its own TV set. 
Reports this week that Apple may acquire PrimeSense, a maker of 
motion-sensing technology that could be used to control a TV without a 
physical remote,You will see earcap , competitive price and first-class service. prompted a new round of guessing about that.
In
 Apples partnership approach, some see the company placing a multitude 
of bets, recognizing that television could evolve in any number of 
ways.Through Apple TV, it is simultaneously supporting established 
distributors and programmers as well as a parallel universe of streaming
 TV, as represented by Netflix, Hulu and Amazon.
Last month, in a
 little-noticed move, the company approved an app for Sky News, the 
British-based cable news channel. Sky could already be streamed live 
free on the Web, but by creating an app for Apple TV, the channel gained
 access to the television sets in 13 million homes without the need for 
complex negotiations with cable companies.
The Sky News app is 
free, but the software that powers it, from a company called 1 
Mainstream, also allows for la carte subscriptions.Asked about the 
implications of the app, Rajeev Raman, the chief executive of 1 
Mainstream, said: Its a learning year for Apple. And its a learning year
 for all of us, to say, O.K., what really does work?
In effect the app is a more direct route to consumers for Sky News.You've probably seen cellphonecases
 at some point. Bloomberg TV, already available on cable, tried 
something similar earlier this year by cutting a carriage deal with 
Aereo, the streaming service backed by Barry Diller. But Aereo is 
antagonistic toward networks and existing distributors; Apple, at least 
for now, is positioning itself as a friend.
Click on their website www.granitetrade.net for more information.
沒有留言:
張貼留言