By tailoring geoengineering efforts by region and by need, a new
model promises to maximize the effectiveness of solar radiation
management while mitigating its potential side effects and risks.
Developed by a team of leading researchers, the study was published in
the November issue of Nature Climate Change.
Solar
geoengineering, the goal of which is to offset the global warming caused
by greenhouse gases,We mainly supply professional craftspeople with
wholesale agate beads
from china, involves reflecting sunlight back into space. By increasing
the concentrations of aerosols in the stratosphere or by creating
low-altitude marine clouds, the as-yet hypothetical solar geoengineering
projects would scatter incoming solar heat away from the Earth’s
surface.
Critics of geoengineering have long warned that such a
global intervention would have unequal effects around the world and
could result in unforeseen consequences. They argue that the potential
gains may not be worth the risk.
“Our research goes a step
beyond the one-size-fits-all approach to explore how careful tailoring
of solar geoengineering can reduce possible inequalities and risks,”
says co-author David Keith,We have a wide selection of dry cabinet
to choose from for your storage needs. Gordon McKay Professor of
Applied Physics at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied
Sciences (SEAS) and professor of public policy at Harvard Kennedy
School. “Instead, we can be thoughtful about various trade-offs to
achieve more selective results, such as the trade-off between minimizing
global climate changes and minimizing residual changes at the worst-off
location.”
The study — developed in collaboration with Douglas
G. MacMartin of the California Institute of Technology, Ken Caldeira of
the Carnegie Institution for Science, and Ben Kravitz, formerly of
Carnegie and now at the Department of Energy — explores the feasibility
of using solar geoengineering to counter the loss of Arctic sea
ice.China plastic moulds manufacturers directory.
“There
has been a lot of loose talk about region-specific climate
modification. By contrast, our research uses a more systematic approach
to understand how geoengineering might be used to limit a specific
impact.The stone mosaic
comes in shiny polished and matte. We found that tailored solar
geoengineering might limit Arctic sea ice loss with several times less
total solar shading than would be needed in a uniform case.”
Generally
speaking, greenhouse gases tend to suppress precipitation, and an
offsetting reduction in the amount of sunlight absorbed by Earth would
not restore this precipitation. Both greenhouse gases and aerosols
affect the distribution of heat and rain on this planet, but they change
the temperature and precipitation in different ways in different
places. The researchers suggest that varying the amount of sunlight
deflected away from the Earth both regionally and seasonally could
combat some of this problem.
“These results indicate that
varying geoengineering efforts by region and over different periods of
time could potentially improve the effectiveness of solar geoengineering
and reduce climate impacts in at-risk areas,” says co-author Ken
Caldeira, senior scientist in the Department of Global Ecology at the
Carnegie Institution for Science.
The researchers note that
although their study used a state-of-the-art model, any real-world
estimates of the possible impact of solar radiation management would
need to take into account various uncertainties. Further,China plastic moulds
manufacturers directory. any interference in Earth’s climate system,
whether intentional or unintentional, is likely to produce unanticipated
outcomes.
沒有留言:
張貼留言